Over the years, I've been using code coverage tools here and there, but somehow never got addicted. In one case
I remember, the tool in question simply could not cope with the codebase, making it impractical to use.
In another case, code coverage results were generated as part of a Sonar build
but this build ran only every few days, which meant that it never created an immediate feedback loop for me. But today,
I think I finally saw the light.
In a small Java project which I inherited, I learned about the code base by bringing the code under test, i.e. by
writing unit tests starting with the lower-level parts of the code and continuing on up to the its external API layers.
This already was quite a fruitful exercise, as it allowed me to make changes in the code very quickly, relying on
the unit tests to alert me of any breakage I caused along the way.
- TBD: Cobertura versus Java 7
- TBD: JaCoCo 0.75 versus Jenkins plugin
Code coverage report not working with Jenkins plugin for
JaCoCo?.
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-28652 hints that this may be
due to a version mismatch between the Jenkins plugin and
JaCoCo?, so I
am downgrading to
JaCoCo? 0.7.4 to test this hypothesis.
Using code coverage, I identified small areas in the code which had not been executed yet by unit tests. Almost each of the tests
I added uncovered another corner case I had not considered yet, or which taught me something about the codebase. Examples: TBD
TBD:
Revision: r1.4 - 06 Nov 2015 - 08:48 - ClausBrod